Daily Wisdom

October 25, 2008

The Coming Of The Lawless One

The coming of the lawless one by the activity of Satan will be with all power and with pretended signs and wonders... --2Thessalonians 2:9

The meteoric rise of Barack Obama has been breath-taking for some, and frightening for others. Who is this man? Where did he come from? Why is he so popular? How has he managed to gain power and position himself to occupy the most important office in the world? There are many unanswered questions.

And the more one digs, the more questions that arise. Why won't he release his orginal vault-copy birth certificate? Why won't he release any college records from Occidental, Columbia or Harvard, including his doctoral thesis? Why won't he release any information about his clients while he worked for the law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard (now known by only the last three names)?

One could certainly cite privacy issues, but if Obama wanted to maintain his privacy, then he should not have entered himself as a candidate for the most important PUBLIC office in the world. In our democracy (or what remains of it), the people have a right to know - as well as a responsibility to find out - who they are voting for. No candidate for high office has the right to withold such basic and pertinent information.

Barack Obama's pattern of deception has been documented by others more qualified than myself. Obama clearly has something to hide and he doesn't want us to find out what that is until after the election. What is he hiding?

Obama has been named in a lawsuit by Philip J. Berg demanding Obama to prove that he is a natural-born U.S. citizen (one of the qualifications required to become President). Obama had until October 15th to respond to the court. He did not. Judge R. Barclay Surrick of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has issued no ruling in the case that would have given Obama more time to comply.

Obama is a lawyer and a legislator (law-maker). He allegedly holds a J.D. (Juris Doctor) from Harvard University where he also allegedly graduated 'magna cum laude'. Obama then, better than anyone, should understand his responsibility to comply with the law. If the Berg lawsuit is simply a nuisance case, then why won't Obama simply respond to it and have the case dismissed? Is Obama thumbing his nose at the courts? I contend that he is. Obama is arrogant enough to believe that he is 'above' the law.

Are there other examples that we can point to which would support such a contention? I think there are. Consider the fact that Obama's campaign has been accepting illegal donations from donors purporting to be “Saddam Hussein”, “Osama bin Laden”, “OJ Simpson”, “Family Guy”, “King Kong” and others. This is a violation of federal election law which carries a criminal penalty. In addition...

A Newsmax analysis of the Obama campaign’s campaign finance disclosures found 60,000 donations in unrounded amounts that fundraising experts said clearly suggested were “foreign currency transactions” translated into U.S. dollars. --RNC: Obama 'Outside Law' on Donors, Newsmax, October 23, 2008

Donations from foreign sources are also illegal. But the Obama campaign apparently has no qualms about spending money illegally obtained from foreign nationals designed to influence the U.S. presidential election. Why would Obama imagine that he must comply with election law? He is "the one". He is "the messiah". He is above the law.

And let's not forget Obama's "questionable" activities and shady associations with the Chicago political machine. And the Chicago real estate developers that got rich providing sub-standard housing through subsidies Obama endorsed. And Tony Rezko, a convicted felon who helped Obama buy his house. And William Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist to whom Obama funneled millions of dollars through the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. And Jim Johnson, an Obama advisor and former Fannie Mae CEO who got a sweetheart mortgage from Countrywide Financial. And Franklin Raines, another Obama advisor and former Fannie Mae CEO who made millions in bonuses through accounting fraud, and who likewise got a sweetheart mortgage from Countrywide Financial.

Illegalities on the part of Obama? Perhaps not, but certainly questionable enough to suggest the appearance of impropriety. If anyone should be under investigation, it is Barack Obama. Why has Obama associated with so many criminals over the years? Why is his campaign at this very moment breaking the law? Why is Barack Obama not complying with the court in a valid lawsuit? If Barack Obama is deceitful and 'lawless', can we then expect him to fulfill the oath of office...?

I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

"So help me God"? ...God help us all.

11 Comments:

At 10/25/2008 6:32 PM , Blogger Ted said...

Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!

 
At 10/25/2008 6:56 PM , Blogger Maggie said...

As John McCain put it "He(Oblahma)
just fell out of the sky"

 
At 10/25/2008 7:14 PM , Blogger Hawkeye® said...

Ted,
Perhaps, but nobody seems to be reporting anything about the Berg case! It's like it doesn't exist. I'm waiting for somebody in the MSM to tell the public about this case, but it just ain't happenin'. I don't even think FoxNews has said anything. It can't be good if nobody knows about it (except us bloggers).

Keep fighting the good fight,
And thanks for 'Viewing'...

(:D) Best regards

 
At 10/25/2008 7:19 PM , Blogger Hawkeye® said...

Hi Maggie,
How ya doin'? It's been awhile. Good to hear from ya! Hope all is well? Oh, and watch out for falling O-blah-ma's. God Bless you dear lady.

(:D) Best regards...

 
At 10/25/2008 7:24 PM , Blogger Barb said...

Remember how Kerry refused to release any records in '04?If the press stonewalls for the Democrat ,it seems there is nothing the American people can do .while Kerry stonewalled ,the accusations of Dubya covering up records and information were a constant topic on the nightly news ,heh heh ,especially Dan Blather.

 
At 10/27/2008 3:36 AM , Anonymous camojack said...

"Curiouser and curiouser", huh?

 
At 10/27/2008 8:41 AM , Blogger boberin said...

Wow, I'm amazed! Not astounded...just amazed.

 
At 10/27/2008 8:55 AM , Blogger boberin said...

And did you geta load of this guy's middle name? I'm nearly certain the he has the WMD's and is prepared to use them should he lose this election.
I'm torn as to whether that means thatthe patriotic thing to do would be to vote for him since I surely don't want him loosing those weapons on an unsuspecting populace.

 
At 10/27/2008 7:45 PM , Blogger Hawkeye® said...

Barb,
Yes, another of example of LLL (looney, left-wing, liberal) media bias...

"Help Obama stonewall, for the 'GOOD' of us all" (Democrats, that is).

(:I) Best regards...

 
At 10/27/2008 7:48 PM , Blogger Hawkeye® said...

Camo,
I can't believe this stuff is NOT being reported. It's just so infuriating!

(:X) Best regards...

 
At 10/27/2008 7:51 PM , Blogger Hawkeye® said...

Boberin,
Do I detect a note of sarcasm in your "amazement"?

He has WMD's all right... "Words of Mass Deception". And he's already been using them against the American public for years now...

(:<) Best regards...

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home